Another job, automated. This robot lays tiles faster and more precisely than any human crew. Perfect precision. Zero breaks. 24/7 operation. The economics are compelling: ✅ 6x faster than human crews ✅ 30-40% lower labor costs ✅ Zero fatigue or injuries ✅ 15% less material waste But here's the real math: ✅ Today: $150K price tag limits adoption ✅ Tomorrow: Mass production drops costs 70% ✅ Next year: Every major contractor has one The ripple effect: ✅ 1 robot = 6 displaced workers ✅ Those workers stop spending locally ✅Tax base shrinks, social costs rise ✅ Political backlash becomes regulatory risk Smart companies are asking different questions: Not "Can we automate?" but "How do we automate responsibly?" ✅ Phased implementation with retraining ✅ Partnership with trade schools ✅ Investment in complementary human skills The C-suite reality: Short-term cost savings vs. long-term ecosystem stability. Your customers, communities, and stakeholders are watching. Automation isn't the enemy. Automation without strategy is. To stay current with the latest trends in #Technology and #Innovation, Subscribe to 👉 #CXOSpiceNewsletter here https://lnkd.in/gy2RJ9xg Or 👉 #CXOSpiceYouTube here https://lnkd.in/gnMc-Vpj #Robotics #Innovation #DigitalTransformation
Automation scaled without a people strategy is a recipe for disruption—not just in operations, but in communities. The real edge comes from embedding human resilience alongside efficiency gains. Tactically smart.
The C-suite is not incentivized to think long term or with any social responsibility, that runs 100% counter to their fiduciary duties. This is the problem we have to solve, our economic model can and will drive us all over the cliff if we don't figure out how to look beyond a few quarters ahead as a species and as society together.
Robos are just getting better
The rush to automate often skips the most important question: should we?
Automation is here to stay, but how we communicate the shift matters just as much as how we implement it.
Helen Yu, really smart take on the phased rollout approach. that ecosystem thinking is what separates companies that scale tech successfully vs those that just chase efficiency metrics.
...yes...thank you for posting, Helen Yu, I see more immidiate job moves towards AI in basic roles, but sure the handycrafts are also going to be impacted...slowly and starting with easy targets, but I am sure it is also going to be become more and more powerful...
1 robot = 6 displaced workers in theory. In reality, there is, and has been for quite some time, a shortage of skilled labor workers for jobs such as this, so robots can help fill that shortage.
Master Future Tech (AI, Web3, VR) with Ethics| CEO & Founder, Top 100 Women of the Future | Award winning Fintech and Future Tech Leader| Educator| Keynote Speaker | Advisor| Board Member (ex-UBS, Axa C-Level Executive)|
2moIt's not about replacing all jobs, but surely robots and automation will take a whole lot of work from people. The question is more, how do we approach this new set-up and how do we educate people to do more advanced work.