This video has over 850,000 views on Instagram and TikTok. I think it struck a chord with people because it points to a flaw in a fundamental assumption of modern capitalism: That more growth is always good for the population. The truth is, economic growth *is* good in the early stages of a nation’s development – as the economy grows, standards of life tend to increase, and people live longer, healthier lives. But at some point, the positive relationship between growth and wellbeing begins to break down. A closer look at the data reveals that the correlation between growth and wellbeing appears to diminish – or even disappear entirely – after nations exceed ~$20,000 GDP per capita. In the video, which is a collaboration with the Wellbeing Economy Alliance - WEAll, I take a closer look at the data for economic growth and life expectancy. The data show that countries like Chile ($15K GDP per capita) and South Korea ($30K) have a higher life expectancy than the USA – despite the USA’s much higher per capita GDP of $60K. In fact, in the USA, life expectancy has recently begun to go down even as the economy continues to grow. Of course, all this doesn’t mean growth is necessarily a bad thing – it just creates its own set of problems. For example, since growth is dependent on energy and resource consumption, global environmental degradation is closely linked to economic growth. And in the USA, for the past several decades at least, growth has come with upward redistribution baked in – which means inequality has gotten worse as the GDP has gone up. Super grateful to my friends at WEAll, especially Kate Petriw, Simon Ticehurst, Amanda Janoo, and Frances Rayner for helping me get this story out there. Their ongoing efforts to bring wellbeing – for both people and planet – to the center of conversations around economics and policymaking is very much appreciated. Here’s to hoping we pull it off. 🙏 #wellbeingeconomy #postgrowth #economics #systemchange
I think it's great to use social media to spread these ideas to a wider public. However, framing these alternatives as suitable only for "later stages of development" perpetuates modernization theory, echoing Rostow's linear stages of development and presuming a universally applicable path. Actually, alternative economic discourses seek to clean up the mess that those paths have created, addressing the harmful impacts they've inflicted on vulnerable communities and nature. It's crucial to avoid perpetuating these injustices when discussing these promising new alternatives.
Canada was the last of the current six countries to sign on the the Wellbeing Economy Alliance, though whenever I’m in a room with policy-makers and ask how we’re actually operationalizing our sign-on, I’m often met with a lack of answers. Moving toward a sustainable, ethical socioeconomic model is absolutely imperative for tackling the climate crisis, as well as both decolonization and a more humane way of living. Wellbeing Economy Alliance - WEAll what would you like to see those of us with an amplified voice push our governments for? How can we work together to strategically pressure Canada’s commitment? Let me know! ✨
Michael, I’ve seen your stuff on instagram and it is great. Please keep posting her if you haven’t already (I just haven’t seen it) as I think the LinkedIn crowd could benefit too. I and others will help amplify.
Looks like a very simplistic view of things. Who said that GDP is the only index you should look at? There are so many indices that are being followed and watched, and it doesn't mean that capitalism isn't good... I don't know, for me it sounds like a high school level simplification of the reality.
Michael Mezzatesta, another way of reframing the speech of a wellbeing economy is not only talking about poverty/wealth in terms of money (dollars, euro) but in terms of "Need". We have poverty of "understanding", poverty of "recreation", poverty of "love", poverty of "meaning" and so on. Just 50 years ago, Mallmann who could be one of the parents of the Wellbeing Economy, wrote about this way of looking at the economy. https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/science-conscience-50-years-foundations-wellbeing-mart%25C3%25ADn-gonz%25C3%25A1lez/?trackingId=d0fXiMKtTY%2Bx4w03eeJdEA%3D%3D
#Growth is what caused our planet to heat up and #breach it's #ecological #boundaries. Going forward we cannot use endless growth to solve our problems. Now think about what #retirement will look like when the strategy for generations has been. (A) Build capital + (B) Invest for growth = (C) Enjoy a wonderful retirement. That model is no longer viable...not in a world where #climate #tipping #points are already happening!
Michael Mezzatesta Great explainer and so true. Doesn't pay you a pension. But does anything in a demographics "crisis"? I mean humans do start to lack the population pressure capitalist models did address. We have no economic model for a shrinking population. This could be one. Plus there is still a lot of folks below the 20K hard currency USD/EU level. Also many people may be at risk of dropping below due to climate change. Also, if capitalism or fossil fuels or globalization and the US pax americana of free shipping across oceans is responsible, is highly debatable. You could go with free markets and safe ocean shipping without the neoliberal in capitalism. Fossil fuels being in a dead end and demographics being on the decline and young customer scarce still puts up the question for a new economic model more focused on well being.
Hi Michael Mezzatesta, wonderful video. Just as a little example. Besides being CEO of a little carsharing company, I am co-funder of for the local chapter of the Economy for the common good of my hometown. Not profit is our companys main goal (even if profits can be made) but the impact on our staff, on nature, society, our partners etc is also important to be taken into account. www.ecogood.org Long live the wellbeing economy 😀
Circular Economist | LinkedIn Top Voice | Helping organisations to go 'from linear 📏 to circular ♻️'
6moMichael Mezzatesta thanks for the clarity and explainer. 🙂