Meazure Learning’s Post

My first Review Article

Some valuable links to enhance your academic research and productivity! 📚💻 - Explore www.refseek.com, a search engine for academic resources with over a billion sources. - Dive into www.worldcat.org to search the content of 20,000 global libraries. - Access over 10 million scientific documents, including books and articles, on https://link.springer.com. - Discover www.bioline.org.br, a library hosting published bioscientific journals. - Volunteer-driven www.repec.org brings together nearly 4 million publications from 102 countries. - Utilize www.science.gov, a U.S. government search engine for 2200+ scientific sites. - Download over 225 million free PDF book titles from www.pdfdrive.com. - Conduct academic research efficiently with www.base-search.net, offering access to 100+ million scientific articles, 70% of which are free. #productivity #searchengine #knlowledgeshare #ProcessVenue #BPO #BackOffice

Teachers who care about students experiencing real-world applications choose Digilent and NI (National Instruments)! Turn theory into reality with these Engineering Teaching Solutions: https://bit.ly/4cPru4J

Teachers who care about students experiencing real-world applications choose Digilent and NI (National Instruments)! Turn theory into reality with these Engineering Teaching Solutions: https://bit.ly/4cPru4J

Do Chemists Die Young? Let’s Talk About It. There’s something fascinating—and often misunderstood—about the life of a chemist. For many, it looks like “just mixing things in a lab,” but there’s so much more to it. Handling chemicals carries a certain thrill and danger, and historically, it wasn’t just a job—it was a gamble. Some of the greatest scientists in history paid the ultimate price for their curiosity. But what about today? Are chemists still at high risk? Curious to know more? Here’s a fascinating article that dives deeper into the stats and science behind this question: https://lnkd.in/dsvAtgsN

Chemical Science now offers concurrent editing! Our user-friendly interface for managing your proofs has a new feature allowing all authors to work on corrections at the same time; while corresponding authors can track, review and approve all changes. Find out more here: https://lnkd.in/eFnRCUme

"Emission Control Science and Technology" by Springer, where my latest article is now published, is the the journal with the slowest publishing process I've ever encountered. It took half a year from the submission date to get it online! A long time ago, Professor Michael Bulanin, himself a founder of "Optics and Spectroscopy" journal, gave me an advice to contact editorial office without hesitation, if there are concerns about publishing process. In case of "Emission Control Science and Technology" this advice was right on the spot, my correspondence with the journal was extensive. At one point I needed to track down an editor via ResearchGate to contact him directly, since emails to the secretary had no effect. After this, our 2,5 month waiting period for the review came to an end. Generating proofs after the decision also took a month, and also required a triggering email to another editor... and so on... Review itself was fine, electronic proofing system was easy to use. The article had no severe issues, requiring substantial revisions. Why it needed to be so slow remains a secret. Luckily there was no hard deadline for the publication, otherwise we would certainly missed it. I wish the journal to gain visibility and interest from the community. The chances for that will increase a lot if the speed of technical handling of the manuscripts is increased. Sorry for ranting.

Engineering publisher pulled 57 papers in a day for peer review ‘irregularities’ The IEEE retracted 57 articles from its journal IEEE Access due to peer review irregularities. The retractions highlight ongoing challenges in ensuring rigorous academic standards for open-access publications. https://lnkd.in/d_cS4h44 #AcademicIntegrity #IEEEAccess #PeerReview #Retractions #OpenAccess #ScholarlyPublishing #AcademicEthics #ScienceTransparency