David Chandler OAM’s Post

View profile for David Chandler OAM

NSW Building Commissioner at NSW Department of Customer Service

I visited the #RidgeApartments (train-wreck) in Auckland this week. One wonders how #IndustryProfessionals, #Certifiers and #Constructors could all have had their fingers in this shocker. This project is in a worse state than #MascotTowers in Sydney. While the destruction of value is just as serious, the way out for Ridge Apartment owners looks to be a lot more complicated than the chance Mascot Towers #Owners and their #Lenders will have in the coming weeks. The Ridge is seeking expressions of interest for sale ahead of winding up the strata scheme. How this will play out, will be anybody's guess. I am told that there are a number of buildings in New Zealand with serious defects that will cost owners millions to repair. And, I understand that the owners of the Ridge apartments and other buildings with serious defects in NZ receive no government assistance. The Ridge Apartments was brought to my attention by #BronwynWeir co-author of the game changing #BuildingConfidenceReport in Australia. See this link, https://lnkd.in/gGjhH6vx It reminds me of the 2019 crisis in new apartment buildings that has driven the powerful reforms leading to the establishment of #BuildingCommissionNSW. I was in NZ to present my insights into the NSW building reform journey so far, as a keynote guest to the #BuildUp24 conference organised by #NZAIB. I was able to explain the strategy deployed, the important legislation that underpinned the reforms, how industry buy-in was enlisted and how measurable change is now playing out. My key message was, do not start this journey without strong cross-party political support. Importantly I was pleased to report that industry does not see these reforms as red-tape, these days. They see them as fundamental to getting their customers back, attracting their investment in new housing stock and contributing to the NSW economy. Effective regulation is good for the economy. There was lots of interest in the tools and levers that a modern regulator can be deploy these days and the initiatives the Commission is developing to help build future industry capability. BuildUp24 was like most conferences I have attended in NZ over the last 20-years. Full of rich content and speakers who delivered practical insights that our industry is, and must embrace. I was struck by #DrSussieKetits insights into the Singapore Institute of Building's strategy to up-skill mid career industry practitioners. And, #AmandaStayne CEO of the #KeystoneTrusts research into how to reset our #Boomer mindset in working with next-gen #Zoomer constructors. There were some remarkable young people on the panels that followed these presentations. Check out https://lnkd.in/gK9rPHZq I also attended a site visit to see a imported volumetric #ModularApartment development. There were some impressive aspects to all of this, but there were some cautions. I will raise these with industry in Australia. Thank you #PamBell 👷♂️

Alice Brimicombe CPA

Digital Supply Chain | Integrated Business Planning | Demand, Supply, Inventory

3d

Separate and apart David Chandler OAM it’s disheartening and disgraceful that even Mum and Dad homeowners are facing defects, blatant lack of duty of care by builders, and unfair treatment. While reforms are underway, it's unbelievable and truly frustrating that builders can just move on to the next project, bringing more families into financial stress and risk. I'd be interested in hearing your reform about a story David Chandler OAM if you have a few minutes to spare.

Jessie Ou

Agency Operation Support Manager - Austagencies Strata

3d

I owned an apartment developed by Defense Housing Australia. You thought the government developer would do the right thing ? Well, we are currently in legal proceedings against DFA. The building defects also cost owners millions to fix, and DFA refused to do it . I would like to hear you thought on this?

RUBÉN FAUS MARTÍNEZ

QLD CAD manager / Construction simulation and visualization solutions at Solid Support Pty Ltd

3h

Just the overall American style construction techniques, materials, coefficients, and finishes of Australia and NZ residential projects are completely outdated. Not to mention that the current codes are not followed or enforced.

Jimmy Ng

Site Reliability Engineer for Optus rapid response team

3d

David Chandler OAM , whilst agreed it's depressing. I think it's worth from time to time to travel overseas and look at some solutions and their cost of doing things properly which may not be as expensive as one would expect. I'm looking at Japan, strong regulation to be earthquake proof. A bathroom replacement was only $4K AUD max including smart-toilet, sink and bathroom. The modular bathroom technology there with economies of scale with an aging population might be worth importing instead of spending 20K AUD on a leaky bathroom in Sydney.

Jesse Miller

innovation. digitisation. transformation. collaboration. teamwork.

3d

Accountability. Poor practices are allowed to continue and instead of personal liability, shonky practitioners walk away with $$$. The "justice" system is too slow and cost prohibitive, and regulators are either complicit, lazy or incompetent. Also, the boomer mindset of capitalism and accumulation of wealth at the expense of others is likely part of the problem. Work practices today are a result of a culture defined by boomer management..... the boomer work culture was defined by the "silent generation, who are also aptly named the "builders".

Kieran Hackshall

Chief Product Officer at Upwire

3d

It seems in NSW the regulators are more focused on harassing small renovators with more codes and paperwork necessary than ensuring large developers are doing the right thing. In any case I do not think that pointing out that there are poor builders in other countries is helpful when you’re own patch is just as bad.

Albert W K Kwok

Financial Adviser / Educator

3d

The problem in NZ is that the authority poke their nose into every stage of the construction, clip the ticket, but do not want to take responsibilities. Since David Chandler mentioned Singapore, see link how it works there. https://quodarchitects.com/guide-to-building-a-house-in-singapore/ In summary (Singapore), the authority only get involve at the start and end - to approve the building plan, and ensure the development was built according to plan. The authority don't tell the developer what material should be use, how construction should be done, etc like the councils here do. The architect manages the whole project from start to finish - manage the team of consultants, conduct site meetings/visits/inspections, etc. No architect will want to risks their license cutting corners. A retired architect friend of mine told me, if the building he signed off collapses tomorrow, he'll be the first to haul to court - there's no retirement from responsibilities. Hence, quality work is assured, including selecting the correct type of materials. Haven't seen a building in Singapore with such leaky issue in over 50 years.

Peter C. Fennell

Global Food Intelligence for Governments, Food Producers & Farmers. International New Business Advisory (INBA) We deliver results. Founder of Microfinance Bank Indonesia (Yayasan)

3d

I have been in one way or another involved in property development and civil construction for 45 years I have had the opportunity to see massive projects in over 20 countries and watch the ways systems are bastardised or corners are cut for money and kickbacks. Some are hidden well and some are the common 3 bag concrete mix and you know the structure will collapse at some stage, but it is not in your power to even say anything and come out alive. It will keep happening while supervisors are bought, and standards are overlooked either by accident because the job is rushed or deliberately. Of all the countries it should not happen in Australia or NZ because we have good standards, but in some cases poorly handled. Flammable exterior cladding is a good example of blind eyes and slow or no rectification

MICHAEL KEARLE

Administrator at Ideal Commercial Flooring

3d

Where are the so-called professionals ( consultants, clerk of works, site manager, etc) all in the pay of the builder/ developer so they turn a blind eye or non-existent as the client will not pay for them due to the cost. worst of all are the certifies and council officials who know diddly squat and are employed in positions far above their capabilities. When I first started work we had a clerk of works on site and they would fail jobs for not being square or in line, we bricked it during their inspections wondering what they would find or what we had missed in our checks.

Kevin Martella

Subject Matter Expert (SME ) & Expert Witness – Buildings, Bridges, Tunnel Structures,

3d

Frankly, if the regulators, politicians, state government, etc. can't fix the rot. Then they should resign or be prosecuted because they are public servants and the public/tax payers pay their big salaries. I have seen similar videos for the past 10 years and I have not seen someone have the gut to fix the rot or at least get reduced and help these innocent people.

See more comments

To view or add a comment, sign in

Explore topics