Andrew Myles’ Post

I am happy to announce that I was recently granted my 94th patent entitled Mobile telecommunications network access point configuration and fiber routing configuration for customer premises equipment Patent number: 12101121 This is my 94th patent in addition to my 3 Canadian patents for a total of 97. Abstract: Mobile telecommunications network access point configuration and fiber routing configuration for customer premises equipment is disclosed. A customer premises component (CPE) can comprise a customer premises mobile broadband to steerable fiber component (CPC) comprising a baseband control unit, a user-plane function component, and a fiber path selection component that can enable configuration of a cellular frontend facing a user equipment (UE) and configuration of a fiber backend facing other endpoint devices. The CPC can receive information pertinent to the configuring the frontend/backend from a network management component, a carrier network component, and internet component, etc. The CPC can automatically adapt configuration of the frontend/backend to selectively enable traffic to flow between the UE and another endpoint device.

Hello everyone, Curious about the top players and challenges in the fast-changing Wi-Fi landscape? Join our live #webinar for #insights on Wi-Fi standard adoption and SEP licensing in the Wi-Fi 6 market, featuring SEP leader Tim Pohlmann of LexisNexis Intellectual Property Solutions and a panel of experts on November 12th 2024 . We’ll expand on our latest report, "Who is Leading the Wi-Fi 6 Patent Race?" and share diverse perspectives from our experts from HP Legal and Ankura.   Topics include: - Managing SEP licensing across varied industries - Key trends in Wi-Fi-related #SEP licensing, litigation, and patent pools - Challenges from limited Wi-Fi patent data for SEP licensing - The evolution of Wi-Fi technology for new applications #bigdata Register: https://lnkd.in/esdVktfT

Industry bodies develop documents that are the fundamental building blocks that fuel compatibility, reliability, and interoperability, serving to simplify product development, cooperation, and time-to-market. Upgrade those documents automatically with DocHub, a platform to digitize, enrich, and structure your association's entire corpus of documents -- from accepted best practices, to contractual standards, to technical standards.

Sanjay Kumar ↗️ TelcoLearn ❇ ❇ Importance of Intellectual Property in 5G and 6G World ❇ ❇ What are different Telecom Patent types and Why SEPs are important for the Growth of the company and country? Wish to know more?  Please join me ( Sanjay Kumar ↗️) in this power-packed session with Hargovind Bansal at 8 PM IST today (Friday 9th Aug) Evening. We will be talking about below topics-  Topics Covered:- ✅ Introduction to the IP World in Telecom ✅ Types of IP Filings and Processes ✅ Standard Essential Patents (SEPs) and Their Role in Organizational Success ✅ Importance of SEPs ✅ Stages for SEP Filing ✅ Q&A Session Link to join the session - https://lnkd.in/gCGkgkk4

Our paper entitled "Checkable Key Generation and its Application to Hierarchical Identity-Based Signature" is accepted to ISITA2024. I have present it in Taiwan.

The much awaited 54-page document to shape the funding for the open source EDA "Recommendations and Roadmap for Open-Source EDA in Europe" presented at ORConf 2024, has been released! Thanks to Stefan Wallentowitz and all the contributors. @FossiFoundation https://lnkd.in/gy-pZt8H

Essence of the decision of PRC(China) invalidation No. 5W133467 (Non-Patentable Subject Matter for China Utility Model): Utility model patents protect improvements to products. The claims can specify the shape or structure of the product using names of known methods, but cannot include improvements to the method itself. If a product claim relies on a computer program to control and operate various hardware modules to achieve its technical effect, and there is no evidence that such control and operation are known methods, then the claimed technical solution essentially includes an improvement to the method (such as the computer program) and is not eligible for utility model patent protection. Titleof the patent (translation) : Intellectual Blood Management System

The cumulative number of Qi standard patent families has surged by over 17 times in the last decade, with 3,557 active Qi-related patent families as of January 31st, 2024. Of the patents analyzed, 30% were identified as standard essential. Explore our latest Qi Wireless Charging report to get a glimpse into this rapidly evolving technology and the patent landscape shaping its future! 🔗: https://hubs.ly/Q02QMS8n0 #Qi #Innovation #IntellectualProperty #PatentData

The cumulative number of Qi standard patent families has surged by over 17 times in the last decade, with 3,557 active Qi-related patent families as of January 31st, 2024. Of the patents analyzed, 30% were identified as standard essential. Explore our latest Qi Wireless Charging report to get a glimpse into this rapidly evolving technology and the patent landscape shaping its future! 🔗: https://hubs.ly/Q02QMS8n0 #Qi #Innovation #IntellectualProperty #PatentData

🖥️ Patenting Computer Implemented Inventions (CIIs, aka software) has become very challenging. 🤓 Last month, IP Australia published the results of their targeted consultation on the patenting of CIIs in Australia, trying to address stakeholder concerns and discussing potential legislative changes and examination practices. Some interesting take aways include: 1️⃣ State of the Law: Most respondents find the current state of the law on patentable subject matter for CIIs in Australia confusing and uncertain, exacerbated by the High Court’s split decision in Aristocrat Technologies Australia Pty Ltd v Commissioner of Patents. #nokidding 2️⃣ Potential for Legislative Change: There is no clear consensus on legislative changes. There is caution about making changes while the US is considering its own legislative changes. Apparently some respondents suggest reconsidering the Manner of Manufacture (MoM) test, while others believe it remains fit for purpose ⁉️ #who 3️⃣ IP Australia’s Practice – Criticisms include: 👉 Inconsistent application of the law #yip 👉insufficient information in examination reports #becauseisayso 👉and the perception that IP Australia is acting as an advocate rather than an impartial authority. (The Patent Office is literally appealing court decisions...! #nowhereelseintheworld 🤷♀️ ) 4️⃣ Effect on Business and Innovation: Difficulties in obtaining patent protection for CIIs in Australia are affecting IP strategies, business innovation, and investment decisions. Licensing decisions and venture capital funding are also impacted due to uncertainties in patentability. 💯 5️⃣ Next Steps and Further Research: IP Australia plans further economic and policy analysis on CII patentability, including the economic impacts on investment and innovation, and exploring practices in other jurisdictions. Additional examples will be developed to clarify practices for stakeholders. #toolittletoolate 🌏 In addition, CII patent applications in Australia, Europe and the US were analysed. According to the results published at the link below, #Australia seems to be somewhere in the middle in between the US and Europe with respect to both filing and prosecution: 👉32% of patent applications filed at IP Australia were classified as CII, compared with 41% at the EPO and 50% at the USPTO. 👉For the CII-PSM-likely-adverse applications, the USPTO has the highest grant rate at 68%, the EPO the lowest at 27% and IP Australia is in between at 54%.