Anders Rundgren’s Post

View profile for Anders Rundgren

🚀 "French Tech" Inventor, Consultant and Entrepreneur

Better late than never!!! 2025-01-28 the European Commission hosted a 2-hour video-call with about 60 enthusiastic participants representing a wide range of interests. Here is a personal review (😎) of some of the issues mentioned. EU Digital Wallet Consortium (EWC) claimed that compatibility with existing rails and infrastructure is paramount. 😎 Comment: Banks already have working solutions for SCA and Pay By Bank. 3D Secure...Ouch! 😎 Comment: Existing infrastructures will (likely) severely hamper innovation. 😎 Comment: FIDO/W3C took this approach with limited uptake as (expected) result. 😎 Chat question: Competing with Apple and Wero? No response. 😆 😎 Observation: The interface to banks remains unresolved. Private discussions (😵) are apparently held with the Berlin Group openFinance. 😎 Observation: Regulations are constantly mentioned as a major hurdle but nobody seems capable translating this to terms that have any significance for developers. Since Apple & Co do not have any known regulatory issues, this problem appears to be self-inflicted. 😆

  • No alternative text description for this image
Lal Chandran

Co-Founder and CTO @ iGrant.io | Digital Identity Wallets | eIDAS 2.0 | Data Regulations

9mo

Please note that the EWC's current approach is extensible and not limiting. For EWC, payments are part of various usecases, and the pilots have strict timelines for piloting various LSP usecases. So, it’s essential to take a stepped approach.

Mirek Kula

Entrepreneur & Business Consultant | Alternative Payments & Distribution Channels in Fin Services & Lottery Business

9mo

"compatibility with existing rails and infrastructure is paramount." Paramount to what? Paramount to making sure that the establishment wins again?

See more comments

To view or add a comment, sign in

Explore content categories