Los Angeles sues Evolution AB and Hacksaw AB over Stake.us

The latest filings in Los Angeles against Stake.us reveal an important and potentially damaging development for publicly traded suppliers. Thanks to Daniel Wallach for making the complaint accessible. The documents demonstrate that prosecutors are not only focused on the operators of the site but also on the game providers who supplied the content. What makes this case remarkable is the explicit naming of Evolution AB and Hacksaw AB. Both are Swedish-listed companies that have built reputations as innovative suppliers in the iGaming industry. Both now face allegations that they knowingly licensed content to a platform operating as an unlicensed casino in California. The possible outcomes range from civil penalties to restitution orders, but the greater risk may lie in reputational fallout and investor reaction. Markets have historically punished Evolution heavily for any suggestion of grey market exposure and Hacksaw Gaming, as a new entrant to the public markets, may be even more vulnerable. This article examines the details of the case, the risks for investors and why the lawsuit could reshape how suppliers are valued.

This is a positive development. Providers must also be held accountable, because it is with their approval that manipulations with game content take place. They are the ones who give permission and enable practices like lowering RTP. Without their involvement, operators wouldn’t have these tools.

To view or add a comment, sign in

Explore content categories