Kam N
Hedge Fund Manager, Venture Capitalist, Commodity Trader, Mega Broker, Investment Banker
Is capitalism dead?
Answers (24)
Dean E
Program Manager, Worldwide Logistics Support Services (WLSS) at Siemens Government Services
Best Answers in: Exporting/Importing (9), Government Policy (7), Treaties, Agreements and Organizations (7), Government Services (3), Internationalization and Localization (3), Planning (3), Government Contracts (2), Social Enterpreneurship (2), Supply Chain Management (2), Biotech (2), Using LinkedIn (2), Commercial Real Estate (1), Purchasing (1), Regulation and Compliance (1), Education and Schools (1), Job Search (1), Mentoring (1), Auditing (1), Corporate Taxes (1), Economics (1), International Law (1), Customs, Tariffs and Taxes (1), Employment and Labor Law (1), Labor Relations (1), Manufacturing (1), Packaging and Labeling (1), Personal Taxes (1), Wealth Management (1), Market Research and Definition (1), Communication and Public Speaking (1), Professional Networking (1), Small Business (1), Green Business (1), Energy and Development (1), Green Products (1), Telecommunications (1), Software Development (1)
No.
Capitalism is very much alive. As long as there is supply and demand there will be capitalism. What is dead is the Middle Class. The US is becoming the Have's vs the Have Nots.
Links:
H.E. W
Publicity and Marketing Coordinator at FSU-GAU (Graduate Assistants United)
Best Answers in: Education and Schools (1), Government Policy (1)
Government subsidized capitalism is in. But it has been "in" for a good while now in the form of corporate tax breaks and subsidies.
I love it when people try to talk about how we have a meritocracy and that capitalism is the true judge of merit. This is the main criticism of affirmative action programs: the idea that they reward mediocrity and/or incompetence.
And here we are with government bailouts that seem to be rewarding the very same things.
It is perhaps fitting that the book opens with Enron and closes with bailouts during the tenure of this administration.
It is perhaps also fitting that the American citizens who put this administration in office for two terms will be the ones footing the bill.
Links:
No
Les D
Software Quality Assurance Lead
Best Answers in: Government Policy (16), Change Management (12), Organizational Development (8), Equity Markets (8), Career Management (8), Using LinkedIn (8), Economics (7), Education and Schools (6), Business Development (5), Personal Investing (5), Ethics (5), Manufacturing (4), Quality Management and Standards (4), Market Research and Definition (4), Starting Up (4), Energy and Development (4), Biotech (4), Computers and Software (4), Computer Networking (4), Web Development (4), International Law (3), Internationalization and Localization (3), Packaging and Labeling (3), Project Management (3), Small Business (3), Job Search (2), Staffing and Recruiting (2), Writing and Editing (2), Wealth Management (2), Positioning (2), Business Plans (2), Green Business (2), Green Products (2), Enterprise Software (2), Facilities Management (1), Travel Tools (1), Certification and Licenses (1), Freelancing and Contracting (1), Occupational Training (1), Conference Venues (1), Accounting (1), Foreign Investment (1), Financial Regulation (1), Government Services (1), Compensation and Benefits (1), Exporting/Importing (1), Offshoring and Outsourcing (1), Treaties, Agreements and Organizations (1), Contracts (1), Corporate Law (1), Guerrilla Marketing (1), Internet Marketing (1), Graphic Design (1), Lead Generation (1), Business Analytics (1), Corporate Governance (1), Labor Relations (1), Planning (1), Bond Markets (1), Derivatives Markets (1), Hedge Funds (1), Non-profit Management (1), Supply Chain Management (1), Individual Insurance (1), Personal Debt Management (1), Personal Real Estate (1), Distribution (1), Engineering (1), Industrial Design (1), Product Design (1), Professional Books and Resources (1), Professional Networking (1), Blogging (1), E-Commerce (1), Information Security (1), Telecommunications (1), Wireless (1)
Was it alive? Which capital is your ism?
Jerry Y
Interaction Architect at Lender Processing Services
Best Answers in: Using LinkedIn (4), Advertising (2), Mentoring (1), Economics (1), Government Services (1), Staffing and Recruiting (1), Change Management (1), Derivatives Markets (1), Personal Real Estate (1), Pricing (1), Career Management (1), Ethics (1)
Capitalism is alive and well. Rumors of its demise are merely exaggerated. However, it seems that american politicians and quite a few business leaders have decided to not believe in it any more. Buffet warned people of this a decade ago. Hey Brazil looks pretty good right now. And Chinas not bad either.
ciao,
jerryork@gmail.com
please feel free to invite/link!
Thomas T
Vice President at ITA, Inc.
Best Answers in: Staffing and Recruiting (1), Commodity Markets (1)
Not even weak. However restraint is very ill.
Look at China and the US.
We have no problem wrecking the other guys life by speculating on the price of oil based on projections of consumption that can not be real.
Or lending money to people that can't afford a house because we can hide the risk in a new "investment product"
Chinese companies have no problem substituting chemicals that make otherwise wholesome foods into poison. Useful drugs are turned into life threatening compounds that can't be detected until enough people die.
Greed is very alive, but GREED ALONE IS NOT CAPITALISM!
The capitalism we all want is when people can have jobs because the objective of profit and employment coexists within the management of companies. The capitalism we all want is when getting the CEO his next bonus thru slash and burn management is secondary to R&D, investment and insuring continued operations. The capitalism we all want is when manufacturing is not treated as a burden to be gotten rid of, but the place where technical innovation can grow.
How do we get that - BY NOT CALLING IT A POLITICAL PROBLEM.
How would you personally contribute to "the kind of capitalism we want?"
Peggy I
Consultant at Investors Group Financial Services Inc.
Best Answers in: Government Policy (2), Equity Markets (2), Career Management (2), Customer Service (1), Freelancing and Contracting (1), Staffing and Recruiting (1), Labor Relations (1), Non-profit Management (1), Personal Investing (1), Retirement and Estate Planning (1), Wealth Management (1), Ethics (1), Small Business (1)
nah, just bruised and embarrassed...
it'll get over it eventually, and do the same stupid things all over again.
Toby Marie W
Independent Consultant, Acclivus PDP
Best Answers in: Using LinkedIn (13), Staffing and Recruiting (8), Government Policy (7), Career Management (4), Government Services (2), Personnel Policies (2), Internet Marketing (2), Equity Markets (2), Commercial Real Estate (1), Air Travel (1), Business Dining and Entertainment (1), Education and Schools (1), Freelancing and Contracting (1), Job Search (1), Event Marketing and Promotions (1), Accounting (1), Compensation and Benefits (1), Criminal Law (1), Events Marketing (1), Business Development (1), Public Relations (1), Lead Generation (1), Sales Techniques (1), Corporate Governance (1), Change Management (1), Organizational Development (1), Bond Markets (1), Non-profit Fundraising (1), Philanthropy (1), Manufacturing (1), Project Management (1), Professional Networking (1), Energy and Development (1), E-Commerce (1)
No, greed is, the entitled attitude is, the "give me" and "you pay" is, but not capitalism in America. Yet.
John F
Senior Director, Public Relations, Sodexo, Inc.
Best Answers in: Green Business (4), Public Relations (2), Energy and Development (2), Commercial Real Estate (1), Event Marketing and Promotions (1), Change Management (1), Career Management (1), Green Products (1)
Capitalism is alive and well and the single greatest source of improvements in opportunity, quality of life and standard of living. Remember that the style of capitalism reflects the culture in which it is being implemented. What has taken a few lumps recently is the style of capitalism that Steven Young, Global Executive Director calls 'brute capitalism' (in his book Moral Capitalism) which combines social darwinism with an economic model. That leads to the idea of haves being somehow superior and have-nots somehow more deserving of their fates.
Links:
John F also suggests this expert on this topic:
M. (Monica) B
Journalist (investigative)/researcher/writer/yoga addict/sports fanatic/deep thinker/firm believer
Best Answers in: Using LinkedIn (36), International Law (4), Mentoring (2), Business Development (2), Planning (2), Career Management (2), Ethics (2), Customer Service (1), Business Dining and Entertainment (1), Hotels (1), Travel Tools (1), Conference Planning (1), Economics (1), Government Policy (1), Government Services (1), Personnel Policies (1), Treaties, Agreements and Organizations (1), Customs, Tariffs and Taxes (1), Internet Marketing (1), Customer Relationship Management (1), Writing and Editing (1), Equity Markets (1), Social Enterpreneurship (1), Inventory Management (1), Manufacturing (1), Personal Investing (1), Wealth Management (1), Industrial Design (1), Professional Books and Resources (1), Communication and Public Speaking (1), Professional Networking (1), Business Plans (1), Starting Up (1), Green Business (1), Blogging (1), Information Security (1), Web Development (1)
I hope so. It has caused enough suffering in this world.
No Capitalism can never get over.As long as the Rich get richer and the poor get poorer capitalism will continue to go stronger.
Ray M
Energy expert, educator, award winning sculptor
Best Answers in: Career Management (16), Ethics (16), Change Management (13), Using LinkedIn (13), Manufacturing (10), Education and Schools (9), Government Policy (7), Personnel Policies (6), Business Development (6), Mentoring (5), Economics (5), Public Relations (4), Organizational Development (4), Equity Markets (4), Small Business (4), Energy and Development (4), Accounting (3), Government Services (3), Planning (3), Project Management (3), Product Design (3), Commercial Real Estate (2), Facilities Management (2), Regulation and Compliance (2), Certification and Licenses (2), Job Search (2), Exporting/Importing (2), International Law (2), Internationalization and Localization (2), Offshoring and Outsourcing (2), Treaties, Agreements and Organizations (2), Criminal Law (2), Events Marketing (2), Lead Generation (2), Business Analytics (2), Non-profit Management (2), Engineering (2), Professional Networking (2), Starting Up (2), Green Business (2), Blogging (2), E-Commerce (2), Wireless (2), Purchasing (1), Business Dining and Entertainment (1), Event Marketing and Promotions (1), Budgeting (1), Corporate Debt (1), Corporate Taxes (1), Compensation and Benefits (1), Staffing and Recruiting (1), Corporate Law (1), Advertising (1), Graphic Design (1), Sales Techniques (1), Writing and Editing (1), Corporate Governance (1), Labor Relations (1), Bond Markets (1), Commodity Markets (1), Option Markets (1), Non-profit Fundraising (1), Social Enterpreneurship (1), Inventory Management (1), Quality Management and Standards (1), Supply Chain Management (1), Personal Investing (1), Industrial Design (1), Professional Organizations (1), Enterprise Software (1), Computers and Software (1), Telecommunications (1), Software Development (1)
Alive and well and evidenced by the massive golden parachutes received by the CEOs of the institutions that are crashing and burning.
Gary S
Award Winning Creative Director, Script & Treatment Writer.
Best Answers in: Government Policy (10), Economics (2), Freelancing and Contracting (1), Event Marketing and Promotions (1), Offshoring and Outsourcing (1), Public Relations (1), Writing and Editing (1), Market Research and Definition (1), Professional Organizations (1), Ethics (1), Starting Up (1), Energy and Development (1), Blogging (1), Software Development (1)
Are you confusing "capitalism" with "free market", as most confuse "religion" with "God"?
Clarification added September 19, 2008:
Maurizio, with all respect, Europe & Asia are not innocent of helping create Golem Amerika. For much of the last century your nations have heartily encouraged an increasingly militaristic America so as to avoid the expense of protecting your own sovereignty, your own trade and the equally corrupt status quo of your governments' power brokers. You cynically traded political & social integrity for lives of relative ease and abundance beneath the umbrella of US might. Now, that the Golem that YOU helped create has lost its moral compass you fault the creature. Perhaps, instead, you should reconsider where the blame truly lies and then share in the work necessary to rehabilitate the monster.
Shah Peerally S
Immigration, Loan Modification negotiation, Bankruptcy & Civil Litigation
I think yes. We are leaning more and more towards mixed economies. Face it the "invisible hand" is dead... or out of control
Links:
Maurizio P
Director at S&I Savings and Investments Ltd.
Best Answers in: Equity Markets (15), Hedge Funds (14), Government Policy (2), Derivatives Markets (2), Futures Markets (2), Job Search (1), Risk Management (1), Personnel Policies (1), Business Development (1), Corporate Governance (1), Commodity Markets (1), Distribution (1), Career Management (1)
Never been alive, was a Ponzi scheme from the beginning, but when tempered by scholarly, fair mannered, patrician gentlemen like FDR, the Middle Cass had a chance.
And the world had a powerful , morally reliable nation to talk to.
With the Administration of Dubya G.W. Bush finally going down in history as the most shameless bunch of cronies ridden, scammers and fraudsters led by a mentally challenged puppet of the Powers that Be (have you seen his clueless face after 8 days of hell without even daring to take his head out of his a*s)
One thing, you Americans must put well in your minds :
All that you have preached to the world so far about free markets and democracy and all....was a BIG BUNCH OF LIES.
You Yanks are a Moral Hazard, to yourself and to the world.
Don't you EVER again go preaching about bringing democracy somewhere else with your Armies.
You're just a bloody rotten empire exactly like the Romans at Caligula times,, and the mental impaired leader you choose is even worse than caligula, he is not even intelligent enough to be evil!! And you have no respect for yourself and no principles you can preach around.
The thousands of soldiers who died in in G.W. Bush useless and liar's war will be your judges, one day, because if the God you fill your mouths with ever existed you will all have to deal with him someday.
The fact that you all as taxpayers will have to foot the bill of all this is just the fitting end to this farce.
You voted this deranged in power for two terms....have fun now.
But don't ever preach about capitalism, or philosophy or principles until a new generation who values morality and sober upbringing has come into power.
Till then, just bugger off the shoulders of the World and pay your debts, beggars!
Clarification added September 20, 2008:
Gary, I acknowledge that as reasonable enough. As usual, maybe things go down to people. Individuals may not be categorized under schemes...and probably, men of goodwill can be found under every sky and every banner.
Is when the men of goodwill abdicate to the shameless, bottomless, PowerHogs we did abdicate recently, that things get out of hand.
I really hope all of us go to the next vote with a good list of the incumbents and carefully avoid each of them and any other professional politician.
We need real people with goodwill and common sense...and it will be a long hard work to repair it.
Not dead as yet.............but looks like it's fighting for its life these days!!
Nicolas L
► Business Consultant ► Open to Learn ► Open to Discuss ► Open to Help ► Open to Connect ► Open to Happiness
Best Answers in: Using LinkedIn (6), Economics (1), Risk Management (1), Advertising (1)
You asked a legitimate question if you mean an absolute free market. It never exists. Market mechanism can only function in a limited range and needs external help to adjust or lubricate the engine.
Actually, we DO need routine oil change (government intervention) to power economic growth.
Stephen A
Futurist, strategist, economist, and entrepreneur.
Best Answers in: Economics (5), Risk Management (1), Government Policy (1), International Law (1), Organizational Development (1), Planning (1), Commodity Markets (1), Professional Organizations (1), Using LinkedIn (1)
Dear Kam,
Yes, and no. The market mechanism as a means of resource allocation is far too useful to be dispensed with, so that aspect of capitalism is likely to stay alive.
The future of American Capitalism, however, is perhaps a bit less certain. With Uncle Sam taking ownership of huge swathes of the financial system, the US economy is going to start looking distinctly European for the next few years. In this respect capitalism is dead, as the US reverts to more of a social-democratic alignment.
With best wishes,
Stephen
Links:
via F
Structuring Complexity Into Opportunity
Best Answers in: Bond Markets (2), Equity Markets (2), Mentoring (1), Economics (1), Risk Management (1), Offshoring and Outsourcing (1), Viral Marketing (1), Derivatives Markets (1), Futures Markets (1), Non-profit Management (1), Engineering (1)
Kam, there is a useful distinction between capitalism and free markets as illustrated by Arrighi and others--see the enclosed link. According to Arrighi, the US form of capitalism entered its final stage in the 1970s. Moreover, capitalism does not die, it just goes to live in another country, with better/more accommodating systems.
At this point in time, increasingly, the answer to your question is in the hands of the US creditor(s). They'll have an increasing say in how the capitalism evolves from here on.
On the other hand, check the second enclosed link to see that I raised a very similar question to yours, about 2 months ago. I was not aware at that time of the distinction between capitalism and free markets, yet I felt there was something rotten in capitalism. Worth reading are all the answers at that time--see also the implicit "socialist" cries from folks in very regulated industries...
Links:
Geoff F
"Hands-on" Software Architect and Senior Developer
Best Answers in: Computers and Software (21), Software Development (20), Web Development (16), Enterprise Software (10), Wireless (7), E-Commerce (6), Blogging (5), Information Storage (5), Telecommunications (5), Offshoring and Outsourcing (3), Biotech (3), Starting Up (2), Computer Networking (2), Information Security (2), Occupational Training (1), Internet Marketing (1), Graphic Design (1), Public Relations (1), Search Marketing (1), Planning (1), Non-profit Management (1), Databases (1), Using LinkedIn (1)
No.
Reganomics and it's variant which includes financing 3 trillion pointless wars with "trickle down" ... yeah, that is dead. (I hope)
Chris G
Residential Mortgage Lending Consultant
Best Answers in: Economics (3), Financial Regulation (1), Internationalization and Localization (1)
Capitalism, like much in the U.S. that we hold dear, is an ideal - not a reality. Much like other ideals we strive for as American exceptionalists, such as democracy, justice, equality, opportunity, fairness, and steroid-free athletics, we steer for what we want to be, understanding that we are not likely to attain any. But we can't compromise on striving for the ideal.
The U.S. economic strength has been forged on the combined influences of government and capitalists. Throughout much of our history, there have been battles and compromises between the two camps. In the recent past, we found the pendulum had swung toward a stronger influence by capitalists; i.e., money bought influence in government. Even when government became involved in business, it did so to favor capitalists who employed lobbyists.
This won't change. In fact, even though we all currently feel that better regulation is required as a result of the troubles, in a year or two, capitalists will use their dollars to prevent much regulation from being passed.
When we talk about what ideals we should collectively pursue as a nation, we aren't always aligned. One recent ideal that has backfired has been the pursuit of increasing home ownership in America to as high a level as possible. With statistics showing minorities with a lower percentage of home ownership than white people, many worked to change that. Government and the GSEs assumed a mission to increase homeownership, and pointed to national stability as the desirable by-product. There was no regard for the mobile economy, where jobs and companies change regularly, requiring the new age of American worker to go where jobs exist. There was plenty wrong with the ideal of increasing home ownership in America - using taxes and bigger government to influence choices in what was supposed to be a free market. And now we see the results of the failed pursuit of that ideal.
Additionally, our political parties can lose sight of the ideals that originally brought them to prominence. The principles of the Republican party, based on truly conservative ideals, have not been followed leading to big government and fiscal irresponsibility. And the social justice espoused by the Democrats has often transformed into a decay in self-reliance, another important American ideal.
We will never agree on the appropriate and properly proportioned ideals, but one would hope that the Federal Government, as stewards of the people, would have a responsibility to be conservative with the taxpayer funds. Our country was formed based on a revolt caused by taxation without representation. The taxpayer needs to hold the Federal Government to an ideal of conservatism.
The funds spent should be used to defend us from others, from each other, and to provide required infrastructure in areas inefficiently served by the private sector. I am not certain how much the government should protect us from ourselves. But it should regulate sufficiently, protecting us from each other, to create an environment of stability for investment.
Please read "Moral Hazard: An Insider's Tale of the U.S. Mortgage Meltdown" that will soon be available. Contact me to find out how to obtain a copy.
I do not think capitalism is dead but I will say this, the bailouts that we are seeing is surely showing that this US economy is a "mixed economy" that a true "free" economy. There has been so much debate amount economists on this topic and now we seem to have a more concrete answer about it, lol.
Steve Volpe
From a purist perspective, we are seeing a type of capitalism. Remember there's crony capitalism, laissez faire capitalism, etc. Just because brokers have convinced government (perhaps correctly) that they are too essential to be allowed to fail does not mean we don't have a free system. The idea that people should be punished for their speculation is extremely naive. This is a psychotic example but it works: imagine your teenager takes the car out and crashes it. Do you refuse to pay the hospital bill to teach him a lesson. I guess you could if you were a purist, but at some point you help solve problems because to not do so, while intellectually satisfying, hurts you, too. No market or industry is an island. There are mini bailouts all the time and they add up. Just look at the annual farm bill. Look at $600 billion in annual government spending (arguably larger given appropriations tack-ons). This hasn't just started to become an inequitable system. It always was, but from another perspective the inequities are equitable or they wouldn't exist. For every lobby, there is another lobby. Sometimes one lobby achieves a monopoly for itself, but that in turn cycles out in time. Wall Street was ascendant, but the death of securitization will be very painful. Consider that capital raising is not rocket science. It takes real genius to convince people that selling stocks and bonds and then helping people trade them takes loads of brains. There are many equally complicated businesses, but it is far easier to charge more for fear and greed than for basic material goods. It is not surprising that industries associated with these strong innate desires for preservation and power should receive inordinate government attention. Anything else would be odd.
Clarification added September 24, 2008:
"Look at $600 billion in MILITARY spending."
